About Leadership Case Studies Impact Contact
LinkedIn ↗
Download CV
Senior Design Manager / Director of Design / Principal Product Designer · Open to Roles

Maju J. Mathew — Design leader with 19+ years in enterprise and healthcare product design. Grew a design team from solo IC to 4, with 12 designers led/mentored across 7 major client engagements. Moves fluidly between IC craft and design leadership. Expert in multi-actor service blueprinting, co-design facilitation, AI trust UX, human-in-the-loop product design, and design systems (140+ component libraries, Figma Variables, Storybook). Tools: Figma, Framer, ProtoPie, HTML, CSS, JavaScript. Based in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Fluent in Tamil, Malayalam, and English. Open to Senior Design Manager, Director of Design, Head of Design, and Principal Product Designer roles in Bengaluru, Chennai, Hyderabad, Coimbatore, hybrid, or remote.

I design for the people
nobody glamourises.

19 years in the backstage of enterprise — depot workers, finance teams, lab technicians, children in clinical assessments. IC craft and leadership, depending on what the problem needs. The work shows up in outcomes you can verify.

Available now Open to: Senior Design Manager · Director of Design · Principal Product Designer · Head of Design
19+
Years Experience
12
Designers Led
€5M+
Contract Renewals
€1.7M
AI-Driven Savings
Enterprise UX & Product Design
BLUEPRINT SYNC
Product design blueprint diagram: business inputs flowing through the product design process into measurable impact
The work, in three See all 7 case studies →
€1.7M Saved eConnect: 95% Accuracy Was Rejected. 87% Was Adopted. AI Trust Design
$2M Saved Newport Tank: Six Actors, One Service View Service Blueprint
22,000 Users Valeo: R&D Engineers Don't Think in Gantt Charts Enterprise R&D
About

I got into product design because I got tired of watching well-resourced teams ship the wrong service.

GxP ISO 17025 Clinical UX WCAG 2.2 AAA

Not from lack of talent — the teams I watched were smart. Nobody was mapping the full journey. Nobody was aligning the backstage to the front stage. That gap is still what gets me out of bed nineteen years later.

From 2012, thirteen years of enterprise client engagements across Europe and the Middle East — Valeo, Syensqo, Newport Tank, eConnect, Omoda: each a separate sector, a separate set of constraints. 80,000 daily users. €5M+ in contract renewals. The 85 stakeholder interviews and 40 hours in steel-capped boots informed the work more than any credential.

Async-first since before it had a name. I run 9am CET workshops from IST. I show up having done the research, argue for the user in C-suite rooms, and measure the work in outcomes you can verify.

Open to senior roles South India · Hybrid or Remote
Maju J. Mathew — Senior Product Design Lead
Maju J. Mathew
19
years enterprise design €5M+ contract renewals
7 industries
12 designers led
40+ projects
AI in my workflow — how I actually use it
Claude Synthesising 20–85 stakeholder interviews into journey maps and insight clusters — work that used to take two weeks now takes two days. I also use it to pressure-test design rationale before I walk into a client room. Figma AI First-pass component variants and auto-layout suggestions during early ideation — faster on structure, more time on the decisions that actually matter. Perplexity Grounding a stakeholder interview guide in market and competitor reality before a kickoff, not after — research that used to eat a day now takes an hour. Miro AI Turning raw sticky-note clusters from co-design workshops into structured journey stages and service blueprints — the clustering pass that used to mean a day of manual sorting now scaffolds in under an hour, leaving the synthesis judgment to me. Notion AI Structuring research docs, sprint retros, and design rationale write-ups. Keeps the paper trail enterprise clients require without the overhead that kills documentation discipline.
A designer I'm proud of

One mid-level designer on my team was technically sharp but struggled to communicate decisions to stakeholders. Instead of prescribing a process, I started bringing her into C-suite syncs as my note-taker — then gradually shifted her to presenter. Within six months she was running design reviews independently. She's now a senior lead at a product-led company in Amsterdam.

The lesson: exposure beats coaching. Give people the room, then get out of the way.

Career Arc · 2006 – Present
2025–Now
Independent Practice
Freelance UX & product design consulting · open to senior roles
2012–2025
Principal UX Lead · Design Consultancy
Rappit.io — Valeo · Syensqo · Newport · eConnect · Omoda
2010–2012
UI Designer / Developer
Mobile Sportsbook · SITmobile
2009–2010
UI Consultant
Spring Info Services — BFSI
2006–2009
Usability Analyst
Novantus Software
Certifications & Credentials
PMP® — Project Management Institute
Lean Six Sigma AI — Yellow Belt
ESG Practitioner — Sustainability & Ethics
Google AI Essentials & UX Design Certified
WCAG 2.2 AAA Accessibility Advocate
Currently thinking about
Things I actually believe · May 2026
Enterprise users deserve emotional design just as much as consumer apps. They just almost never get it.
Simplicity is usually political, not visual. The complicated interface is usually protecting someone's territory.
If your product design process doesn't surface something uncomfortable about the organisation, it isn't deep enough.
Process is a starting point, not a destination. The designers I respect most know when to follow it and when to drop it and just pair directly with the engineer in the room.
The hardest users to design for are the ones who can't tell you what's wrong — children, people in crisis, workers in safety gear. They're also the most worth designing for.
How I think about AI design — 4 principles Applied across eConnect · Rappit · Autitouch
01
Transparency
over accuracy

Make the AI's reasoning visible — not its confidence score.

Users don't reject AI because it makes mistakes. They reject it because they can't see where it's certain. The eConnect heatmap tripled adoption at lower accuracy than a competing design.

02
Human-in-the-loop is a design decision,
not a fallback

Decide where humans belong before the AI is built, not after it fails.

Correction flows and override affordances designed in from the start raised eConnect engagement from 34% to 89%.

03
AI trust is a service problem,
not a UI problem

Every touchpoint a user has is part of the trust architecture.

The heatmap worked. The account manager layer didn't — nobody briefed them on what an accuracy dip meant.

04
Guardrails are product features,
not edge cases

Confidence indicators and override flows belong in the spec from day one.

In regulated environments, surfacing uncertainty honestly isn't compliance overhead — it's the condition under which the product gets used at all.

Valeo · Syensqo · eConnect · Newport Tank · Omoda · Hunkemöller · Rappit.io · Hoyer Group · Sanquin · Autitouch ·
Leadership & Philosophy

How I actually lead.
Not how I say I lead.

Six-stage methodology. Three leadership commitments. One signature capability — human-in-the-loop AI design. Each backed by an outcome I can name.

01
Executive
Alignment
OKRs → UX goals before a wireframe is drawn
02
Empower
Designers
I architect — senior designers own execution
03
Scale
DesignOps
Lean Six Sigma + PMP → 50% less rework
04
Grow
Talent
1→4 designers · 94% retention · −30% hire time
05
GenAI &
Engineering
Workflow automation · tech feasibility locked
06
Measurable
ROI
Every decision traceable to revenue & retention
Signature Capability
00 — AI Product Design · Signature Capability
Human-in-the-Loop
UX Design

Most AI product failures aren't model problems — they're trust and interpretability problems. I design the layer between the AI output and the human decision: confidence interfaces, exception flows, and the handoff moments that determine whether people trust the system or override it.

  • eConnect: AI trust score 2.1→8.7/10 · €1.7M annual savings
  • Human override rate 62→11% · 1.8M invoices automated
  • Confidence heatmap replaced accuracy scores — adoption tripled
How I approach it
1
Diagnose the right layer
Is it a model problem or a trust design problem? They need different solutions. Most teams conflate them.
2
Design the handoff moment
Confidence signals, exception UX, and escalation paths that make AI behaviour interpretable — not just accurate.
3
Measure with AI-specific metrics
Trust score, override rate, task success — not just business outcomes. The model may be fine. The UX may not be.

Get this layer wrong and a 95%-accurate model still gets rejected. The risk in an AI hire usually isn't the model — it's whether someone designed the trust layer around it before launch, not after the first bad quarter.

Where I want to take this next: agent-based systems, where the handoff moment between AI and human judgement happens more often, with less warning — and matters more each time.

Read the full essay: Why Transparency Beats Accuracy in AI Product Design
Proof, Not Just Principles
eConnect AI Guardrail and Policy Map — three tiers showing what the AI auto-approves, flags for review, and always escalates to a human
AI Guardrail & Policy Map — eConnect, three decision tiers
Design System Governance diagram — handoff corrections reduced from 3.1 to 1.2 rounds per component, 140+ components across 3 surfaces, 50% rework reduction, weekly governance cadence
Design System Governance — 140+ components, 3.1→1.2 handoff rounds
Leadership Commitments
01 — Process & Governance
Predictable Ops

I applied DMAIC to Rappit.io's design process before it was called DesignOps. The result: half the rework in a single quarter, designers spending time on hard problems instead of revision loops. I hold the PMP® credential and a Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt — but structured governance is how I think about design at scale, not just letters after my name.

50% rework reduction
in one quarter · Rappit.io
PMP® Lean Six Sigma AI DMAIC applied
02 — Human Capital
Scaling Talent

I built career ladders and mentorship structures before posting a single job. One mid-level designer who struggled to present to executives is now a senior lead in Amsterdam — because I moved her into C-suite reviews as note-taker, then presenter, then owner. That's the model: exposure over coaching. Fully remote for 13 years — async documentation replaced synchronous meetings as the default, not the exception.

12 designers led
across 4 countries
4 countries 94% retention Exposure model
03 — Ethics & Inclusion
Inclusive Design

I've designed for children who can't tell you what's wrong, depot workers in safety gloves, and lab technicians under ISO audit pressure. Accessibility is never an afterthought in that context — it's the constraint that makes the design real. Screen-reader task completion from 62% to 99.2% on a national healthcare portal, through WCAG CI/CD gates baked into the process.

62→99% screen-reader
task success
ESG Practitioner WCAG 2.2 AAA Google UX Certified
Evolution of My Practice

How my definition of good design changed.

When I started in 2006, I thought good design meant a clean interface. I measured success in pixel precision and user satisfaction scores. I was proud of my work and most of it was wrong — not technically, but strategically. I was solving the visible problem and ignoring the system behind it.

Around 2014, after a project at a logistics firm where a beautifully designed interface failed because the backstage process it relied on was broken, something shifted. The depot workers loved the screen. The service still didn't work. That's when I understood: most design problems aren't visual problems. They're organisational problems wearing a UI costume.

Now I spend as much time on what doesn't show up in Figma — the handoff between actors, the undocumented process, the warehouse workaround that actually works — as I do designing the interfaces themselves. A beautifully designed product still fails if the backstage it relies on is broken. That's why I map both: the service that surrounds a product, and the product that delivers the service.

2006–12
Making interfaces

Usability research, UI development, BFSI compliance design. Measuring success by how clean it looked and whether users could complete tasks. Getting good at the craft of the screen.

2012–18
Discovering the backstage

The logistics project that broke me. Started blueprinting frontstage and backstage together. Realised the interface was often the least interesting part of the problem — the process behind it was where everything actually went wrong.

2018–23
Product design as political work

Facilitating the room with 45 business unit heads who all believed their service was most critical. Understanding that alignment is a design problem. The blueprint isn't the output — the conversation it forces is the output.

Now
Still evolving — and that's the point

AI is changing what product design can see — pattern recognition at scale, hidden dependencies in complex workflows. But the human judgment about what those patterns mean, and what an organisation is actually ready to do about them, that part hasn't changed. And I don't think it will.

Most AI product failures I've seen weren't accuracy problems. They were trust design problems. The model was fine. Nobody thought about what happens when it's wrong.

— Maju J. Mathew · eConnect: AI trust score 2.1→8.7/10
Selected Work

Real Clients.
Measurable Outcomes.

Enterprise UX across logistics, fintech, automotive R&D, healthcare and AI — each project anchored to a business outcome you can verify.

9 Projects · 7 Industries
Syensqo Product Design Dashboard
Syensqo · Product Design 100+ services · 13,000 users · 30 countries
Product Design Life Sciences
€500K Saved

Syensqo: Zero-Disruption Digital Independence

Syensqo SA · Principal Product Designer · Ongoing 2023–

A 90-day legal deadline to separate 134 business-critical services from Solvay — across 13,000 employees, 30 countries, ISO and GxP compliance. The insight that drove everything: if new services preserve existing mental models, you don't need a training programme. €500K saved. Zero working days lost.

Key Design Decision
Chose evolutionary UI redesign over a clean-slate rebuild across 89 applications — 89% acceptance vs. 41% for the revolutionary alternative. €500K in training costs avoided was the result.
Product Design · Transformation Open →
Rappit Developer Platform
Rappit · Developer Platform Model-first UI · Live code preview · 4× velocity
Product Design Low-Code Platform
4× Velocity

Rappit: The Trust Problem in Developer AI

Rappit.io · Principal UX Lead · 2012–2025

Developers weren't afraid of AI-generated code. They were afraid of code they couldn't inspect, own, or debug. An always-visible code preview — never hidden, never abstracted — turned sceptics into daily users. 4× dev velocity. 89% 90-day retention vs 34% industry average. 80K DAU.

Key Design Decision
Rebuilt the platform's entry point around data-model design instead of a visual page-builder — 73% of enterprise developers start with the model, not the screen.
Developer Tools · Enterprise SaaS Open →
eConnect AI Invoice Processing
eConnect · AI Invoice Confidence heatmap · Human-in-loop · 1.8M invoices
Product Design AI / FinTech
€1.7M Saved

eConnect: 95% Accuracy Was Rejected. 87% Was Adopted.

eConnect · Lead UX Strategist · 12 months

Finance professionals rejected the higher-accuracy model because they couldn't see its reasoning. Confidence heatmaps — showing the AI's certainty field by field — tripled adoption at lower accuracy. Transparency outperformed accuracy. €1.7M annual savings. AI trust score 2.1→8.7/10.

Key Design Decision
Replaced accuracy scores with a confidence heatmap overlaid on the document — adoption tripled with identical AI performance. The problem was never accuracy. It was interpretability.
2.1→8.7
AI trust score /10
62→11%
human override rate
94%
task success rate
GenAI · Document Processing Open →
Valeo R&D Project Suite
Valeo · R&D Platform Milestone timeline · 22,000 engineers · 66 centres
Product Design Automotive R&D
22,000 Users

Valeo: R&D Engineers Don't Think in Gantt Charts

Valeo SA · Lead UX Strategist · 18 months

8 weeks of ethnographic research across 5 countries surfaced the core problem: R&D professionals plan in milestone narrative beats, not dependency chains — but every tool assumed otherwise. Replacing Gantt with a visual milestone timeline got 91% A/B preference. 15,000 engineering hours saved per year.

Key Design Decision
Replaced the Gantt chart paradigm with milestone-based timelines — only 23% of R&D engineers had Gantt intuition. Wrong mental model, not bad execution.
Enterprise · R&D · SAP Integration Open →
Omoda ERP Dashboard
Omoda · ERP Modernisation Inventory dashboard · Mobile scanner · +31% productivity
Product Design Retail & Wholesale GenAI Follow-On
+31% Productivity · 2.5× Conversion

Omoda: The ERP That Failed Once Already

Omoda B.V. · Lead UX Designer · 14 months

A previous modernisation was abandoned after 18 months, leaving deep organisational scepticism. 40 hours shadowing warehouse workers across three shifts — not in a conference room — revealed the prior system failed because it was designed for screens, not for people in safety gloves under variable lighting. 67% error reduction. +31% picker productivity. A later GenAI styling initiative for the same client — replacing text-based preference input with visual, pattern-matched recommendations — lifted conversion 2.5×.

Key Design Decision
Digitalised workers' own colour-coded Post-it workaround instead of replacing it with a "better" system — treating years of shop-floor knowledge as a resource, not a problem.
ERP · WMS · Mobile Ops Open →
Supporting detail Outcomes at a glance · Engagement scope
Zero disruptions. €500K saved. 13,000 people moved to a new digital estate in 90 days — Syensqo
Service blueprinting· Change management· Life sciences· Multi-region
$2M demurrage avoided. NPS 12 to +47. Six actor types who'd never shared a service view — Newport Tank
Journey mapping· Multi-actor service· Logistics· Co-design
€1.7M annual savings. The 87%-accurate AI got rejected. The 87% AI with trust design got adopted — eConnect
AI trust design· Human-in-the-loop UX· FinTech· 1.8M invoices/year
Sessions to diagnostic signal: 3→1. Designing for a user who can't tell you what's wrong — Autitouch
Clinical UX· Multi-actor service design· Healthcare
+31% picker productivity. A previous modernisation had already failed once — Omoda ERP
ERP modernisation· Ethnographic research· Retail· Change management
15,000 engineering hours saved per year. R&D professionals don't think in Gantt charts — Valeo
Enterprise UX· Automotive R&D· Cultural adaptation· 22,000 users
4× dev velocity. $4M revenue. Developers don't fear automation — they fear the black box — Rappit
Developer platform UX· Low-code· DesignOps· 80K DAU
25% efficiency gain. Same trust problem as eConnect, different documents — Verhoek Europe
AI trust design· Human-in-the-loop· Logistics
Part of a platform rebuild that tripled revenue — eParts.shop
Product discovery· E-commerce· Recommendation logic
Client & Industry Role & Engagement Discover Define Blueprint Build Measure Methods Used Verified Outcome & Duration
Syensqo Solvay spin-off · Global Life Sciences Principal Product Designer Full E2E · sole PD lead · C-suite Service blueprinting Swimlane mapping Change management Design system €500K saved 100+ services blueprinted · 13,000 employees · 30 countries · zero disruption 2023 – Ongoing
Newport Tank Containers · Global logistics Logistics B2B Product Designer Discovery → Blueprint · 6-actor Journey mapping Multi-actor blueprint Stakeholder interviews Co-design workshops $2M avoided Demurrage cut · NPS 12→+47 · processing time −40% 9 months · Completed
Rappit.io Enterprise SaaS · Low-code Developer Tools Principal UX Lead Full E2E · team of 4 · C-suite 25 user interviews WCAG 2.1 AA GenAI integration Lean Six Sigma 4× velocity $4M revenue · 94% task success · 80K DAU · 50% rework cut 2+ years · Completed
Omoda European fashion retail · B.V. Retail & Wholesale Lead UX Designer Discovery → Measure · ERP replace AS/400 ERP migration Mobile-first UX Usability testing Change management +31% productivity Errors 8.3%→2.7% · satisfaction 2.1→4.3/5 · 15-yr legacy replaced 18+ months · Completed
Autitouch Autism diagnostics · Netherlands Healthcare Lead Product Designer Full E2E · 4-actor service design Multi-actor service blueprint Clinical UX Child-centred design 3→1 diagnostic sessions Zero inter-rater variance · 100% therapist task completion 8 months · Completed
eConnect AI invoice automation · NL AI / FinTech Lead UX Designer AI/ML Discovery → Measure · human-in-loop Human-in-the-loop UX AI confidence design ML workflow mapping Trust calibration €1.7M saved AI trust 2.1→8.7/10 · 1.8M+ invoices/yr automated 18 months · Completed
Valeo Automotive R&D · SA · Global Automotive R&D Lead Product Designer Define → Measure · SAP-integrated SAP integration design Enterprise UX Milestone planning Multi-region rollout 67% faster setup 22K engineers · 66 R&D centres · 8,000+ concurrent projects 2024 – Ongoing

Selected Case Studies — Maju J. Mathew

Nine enterprise service design and UX projects with verified outcomes across life sciences, logistics, developer tools, retail, AI/fintech, automotive R&D, and healthcare industries.

eConnect: AI Invoice Processing — AI / FinTech

Role: Lead UX Strategist. Duration: 12 months (6-month trust-building rollout + 6-month optimisation). Client: eConnect, AI invoice automation platform, Netherlands.

Designed the human-in-the-loop trust architecture and exception UX for an AI platform automating 1.8M+ financial invoices annually for enterprise clients. The core design challenge: finance professionals (deeply risk-averse) need to trust AI decisions without feeling replaced. Early prototypes with 95%-accurate AI were rejected; redesigned confidence heatmaps with 87% accuracy achieved 3× adoption — transparency outperformed accuracy.

Methods used: 25 interviews with accounting professionals (75–90 minutes each), 8 contextual workflow studies, document confidence heatmap design (colourblind-safe with texture and colour dual coding), human-in-the-loop correction reframed as "teaching the AI," progressive AI disclosure model, role-based AI performance dashboards, ML workflow mapping, trust calibration research. A/B test (n=140): heatmaps produced 73% faster decision-making, 87% user preference, 34% improvement in catching AI mistakes.

Verified outcomes: €1.7M annual cost savings (from €2.3M manual to €0.6M AI-assisted, measured at 12 months post full rollout). AI trust score improved from 2.1 to 8.7 out of 10 (user willingness to accept AI decisions without manual review). 86% error rate reduction. 94% AI accuracy at 6 months (improved from 78% at launch via human-in-the-loop correction). 1.8M+ invoices automated annually. Johan Schaeffer, CEO eConnect: "Core enabler to our ambition to provide a fully automated service."

Design principle, generalised beyond documents: any AI system making a claim it can't be fully certain of — including a conversational agent or customer-facing bot — faces the same adoption problem eConnect did. Users don't reject an AI for being wrong; they reject it for being unreadable about where it might be wrong. The same confidence-legibility and correction-as-first-class-interaction pattern designed for eConnect's document review applies directly to conversational AI trust design.

Syensqo: Service Design Transformation — Life Sciences

Role: Lead Service Designer & Programme Design Director. Duration: 18 months (90-day critical separation phase + 15-month optimisation programme). Client: Syensqo SA (Solvay spin-off), global life sciences and specialty chemicals company.

Led end-to-end service design strategy for Syensqo's complete digital independence — 134 business-critical applications across 12 user groups and 30 countries following the December 2023 spin-off from Solvay. The engagement required simultaneous service architecture, governance, distributed team leadership (6 designers across 4 countries), and change management at scale with a hard 90-day legal separation deadline.

Methods used: Service blueprinting, swimlane mapping across 12 user groups, 85 stakeholder interviews and co-ideation workshops, prioritisation matrix (business continuity risk × daily user count × regulatory dependency), evolutionary change management framework, phased service migration.

Verified outcomes: 100+ services modernised (134 total — 89 fully modernised, 31 migrated with service improvements, 14 sunset with workflow alternatives designed). €500K+ training cost avoided — no formal training programme required because evolutionary service design preserved user mental models. 89% user acceptance rate (vs 41% industry benchmark for large-scale digital transformation). Zero working days lost to system unavailability during the 90-day critical separation period. 13,000 employees across 30 countries served. Scientific data integrity maintained throughout (ISO 17025, GxP compliance).

Newport Tank Containers: Multi-Actor Service Design — Logistics B2B

Role: Lead Service Designer. Duration: 14 months. Client: Newport Tank Containers — global ISO tank container logistics operator, 480 employees, 22 offices, 100,000+ containers/year, $400M+ annual revenue.

Designed a real-time digital service replacing paper-based workflows across 6 actor types: depot operators, drivers, customs brokers, shipping agents, customers, and management. Scope: customer tracking portal, field operations mobile app, customs documentation system, and management dashboard. The service operated in remote depots with intermittent connectivity and handled hazardous materials requiring regulatory documentation.

Methods used: End-to-end service blueprinting across 6 actor types, time-motion study across 5 depot locations, journey mapping by actor type, field co-design sessions with 8 warehouse workers across weekly iterations, stakeholder interviews, offline-first mobile architecture design, hazmat compliance workflow design.

Verified outcomes: $2M annual demurrage cost avoided (from $2M to near-zero, measured over 12 months vs prior-year baseline). NPS improved from 12 to +47 (+35pts) in 12 months post-launch. Order processing time reduced 40% (4–6 hours to 2.5 hours average). Customer service call volume reduced 65% by self-service tracking portal, freeing the operations team to manage exceptions proactively rather than respond reactively to status enquiries — client quote: "We can finally proactively manage issues instead of reacting to them." 91% field staff adoption within 6 months.

Rappit Developer Platform — Low-Code Enterprise SaaS

Role: Principal UX Lead and Researcher. Duration: Founding era through enterprise AI platform (2012–2025) — solo IC to 4-person design team. Client: Rappit.io, enterprise AI-led application development platform.

Led UX strategy for an AI-led application development platform serving 80,000 daily active users including enterprise clients Valeo, Omoda, eConnect, Hunkemöller, Syensqo, and Newport Tank. Grew the design team from solo IC to 4 designers. Central design challenge: enterprise developers (protective of code ownership) must trust and adopt an AI copilot's generated automation without feeling they lose control or quality — the same trust problem now facing conversational and agentic interfaces more broadly.

Methods used: 25 in-depth developer interviews (60–90 minutes each), 40 hours contextual inquiry, galvanic skin response measurement, Trust Erosion Map research artefact, Jobs-to-be-Done framework, model-first UX architecture (validated at 85% preference in A/B test, n=120), always-visible code preview trust surface, WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility, Lean Six Sigma process improvement, GenAI workflow integration.

Verified outcomes: 4× developer velocity (8 days to 2 days time-to-first-deployed-feature). 94% task success rate (up from 61%). 82/100 SUS score (Grade A benchmark). 89% 90-day developer retention (vs 34% industry average). 50% rework reduction. 80,000 daily active users. Design team grown from solo IC to 4 designers. $4M revenue.

Omoda ERP Modernisation — European Fashion Retail

Role: Lead UX Designer. Duration: 14 months — phased migration across 4 operational departments. Client: Omoda B.V., leading European fashion retailer processing €180M annual revenue.

Replaced a 15-year-old AS/400 ERP system for a 200-person retail and warehouse operation, while keeping operations running continuously. A previous ERP modernisation had been abandoned 18 months prior, creating deep organisational scepticism. Designed warehouse picking apps, purchasing dashboards, retail POS interfaces, and management reporting.

Methods used: Ethnographic field study (40 hours shadowing 15 warehouse workers across 3 shifts), 22 user interviews across departments, co-design sessions on the actual warehouse floor, mobile-first scanner app design (56px+ touch targets for industrial gloves, 7:1+ contrast ratio for variable lighting), progressive in-app training, design ambassador change management programme.

Verified outcomes: 67% error rate reduction (from 8.3% to 2.7% scan error rate in first 60 days). 31% increase in orders per picker per day (90-day rolling average vs prior-year baseline). User satisfaction improved from 2.1 to 4.3 out of 5 (n=187 users surveyed). 89% user acceptance rate (vs 62% industry average for ERP implementations). Jan Baan, CEO: "With the new intelligent ERP, we achieve double-digit revenue growth and double-digit efficiency gains." In a later engagement with the same client, redesigned Omoda's style-recommendation experience from text-based preference input to a visual, GenAI-curated surface — a follow-on initiative (Omoda AI Stylist) that lifted conversion rate 2.5×.

Valeo R&D Project Suite — Automotive R&D

Role: Lead UX Strategist. Duration: 18 months — 8-week global research + 6-month design system + phased rollout. Client: Valeo SA, Tier-1 automotive supplier and France's top patent filer. €2.6B annual R&D spend (2023). 112,700 employees across 29 countries, 66 R&D centres globally.

Designed a project planning platform directly serving 3,000 engineers, integrated as a module in a wider R&D suite used by 22,000+ engineers across 66 R&D centres globally, managing 8,000+ concurrent projects. Replaced a legacy system with a 45-second load time. Key insight: R&D professionals think in milestone narrative beats, not task dependencies — traditional Gantt interfaces failed completely (only 23% found them intuitive).

Methods used: 8-week global ethnographic research across 8 R&D centres in 5 countries, 45 contextual interviews, 120 hours observation, visual milestone timeline design (replacing Gantt charts, validated at 91% preference A/B test n=156), SAP integration design, contextual collaboration hub embedded within project views, RTL language support, cultural adaptation for French, German, Chinese, Moroccan, and Arabic engineering teams.

Verified outcomes: 67% faster project setup (45 minutes to 15 minutes, validated in controlled task testing n=156). 15,000+ engineering hours saved per year. ROI realised in under 1 year (licence savings). First version delivered in 5 months. 92% global user satisfaction across all 5 countries and 8 R&D centres tested. Sub-3-second response time for projects with 2,000–4,000 tasks (down from 45 seconds on legacy platform). 76% reduction in project email volume. Gilles Vidal, Digital Domain Manager — Project Management Tools, Valeo: "Tremendous value and time-savings to our thousands of engineers managing more than 8,000 projects globally."

Autitouch: Autism Diagnostic Service Design — Healthcare

Role: Lead Service Designer and UX Architect. Duration: 8 months. Client: Autitouch, Netherlands — autism diagnostic technology platform.

Designed a 4-actor service blueprint for a clinical ASD diagnostic platform built around an interactive drawing test on a touchscreen tablet. The service involved four simultaneous actors: a child with autism (primary user, experiencing the test as play), a therapist managing the session, a parent or caregiver present in the room, and a diagnostician receiving structured output after the session. Each actor required a different view of the same moment. The child could never know they were being assessed.

Methods used: Multi-actor service blueprinting (child, therapist, parent, diagnostician), clinical contextual observation across two ASD therapy centres, structured interviews with occupational therapists and parents, literature review of ADOS-2 and Beery VMI diagnostic instruments, play-frame interaction design for non-verbal users, peripheral-glanceable therapist dashboard, audio micro-cue UX (earpiece), parent observation form as a designed service role, ADOS-2 aligned diagnostic report architecture, offline-first tablet interaction design.

Verified outcomes: Sessions needed for diagnostic signal reduced from 3 to 1. Inter-rater scoring variance eliminated through objective motor data capture. Therapist's concurrent cognitive load reduced from 4 simultaneous tasks to 1. 100% therapist task completion rate in usability testing (n=4 therapists, 2 sessions each) with no errors after a single training session. Parent anxiety behaviours measurably reduced in pilot sessions through structured observation role design.

Verhoek Europe: Human-in-the-Loop Document Processing — Logistics / AI Trust

Role: UX Designer, AI Verification Workflow. Duration: to confirm. Client: Verhoek Europe, transport and logistics operator.

Verhoek needed to convert a high volume of unstructured transport documents into structured, analysis-ready data — the same underlying trust problem as eConnect's invoice automation, applied to a different document type and industry. Designed a multi-human verification workflow where the system proposes structured, corrected data and more than one reviewer verifies it before acceptance downstream, with verified corrections feeding back to improve pattern recognition over time.

Methods used: Human-in-the-loop workflow design, multi-reviewer verification structure, correction-as-training-signal feedback loop (adapted from the eConnect trust-design pattern).

Verified outcome: 25% improvement in operational efficiency (source: Rappit.io published case study, rappit.io/cases/verhoek-europe-replace-tms).

eParts.shop: Preference-Based Product Discovery — E-Commerce / CRM (Salesforce)

Role: UX Designer, Product Discovery & Recommendation Logic. Duration: to confirm. Client: eParts.shop, e-commerce parts retailer.

As part of a broader platform rebuild (a custom Salesforce-based e-commerce backbone, mobile warehouse app, and B2B vendor portal), designed the landing/discovery page logic — grouping items frequently purchased together and surfacing parts a customer was statistically likely to need, based on their own stats and purchase patterns, built on top of the Salesforce CRM data layer unifying orders, inventory, and customer records.

Verified outcome: Rappit.io's published case study credits the overall platform rebuild — not this feature in isolation — with tripled revenue and 1,000+ daily orders across new warehouses (source: rappit.io/cases/eparts-shop).

Dockmaster: Warehouse Pick-to-Pallet QR Concept — Internal Initiative, WMS / Lean / DMAIC

Role: UX Designer. Duration: concept validation phase, to confirm. Client: Internal Rappit.io initiative, demoed to four prospective client engagements (Verhoek, Valeo, Solvay, Syensqo) — not a commissioned client project, not shipped to production.

Designed a browser-based, phone-tested concept (Figma + HTML/CSS/JS) for scanning boxes by QR code and arranging them onto pallets, validating the interaction cheaply before committing to native development. Adapted the quality-framework layer per prospective client's existing practice — Lean/Six Sigma framing for Valeo, DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) framing for Verhoek — rather than a one-size-fits-all pitch. Once approved, the concept was rebuilt in Flutter by engineering for native Android camera/scanner access needed for production-grade QR reading.

Verified outcome: demoed across four prospective engagements; genuine interest from the Verhoek-owned company, while the others already had established solutions in place. This did not progress to a shipped, production deployment — no production floor metrics exist to report. The interactive demo shown in this portfolio is a self-built recreation using generic, non-client data; it combines the Lean and DMAIC framings from two separate client conversations into a single demo, since no one client saw them together.

€1.7M
Cost Savings · eConnect Year 1
46K+
Daily Active Users · Valeo + Omoda
67%
Error Reduction · Omoda Ops
1.8M+
Invoices Automated Annually
Verified outcome · eConnect AI
2.18.7
AI trust score / 10

95%-accurate AI was rejected by finance professionals. Redesigned with confidence heatmaps at 87% accuracy — trust tripled. Transparency outperformed accuracy.

€1.7M annual cost savings · 86% error rate reduction · 1.8M+ invoices automated
Client Voice
"

"Tremendous value and time-savings to our thousands of engineers managing more than 8,000 projects globally on a daily basis."

GV
Gilles Vidal
Digital Domain Manager · Valeo SA
"

"A core enabler to our ambition to provide a fully automated service. The human-centred approach to AI has been crucial for user adoption."

JS
Johan Schaeffer
CEO · eConnect

Verifiable via LinkedIn recommendations · linkedin.com/in/majujmathew

Availability

Let's talk about
the service
you're trying to fix.

Open to senior design leadership roles, advisory engagements, and strategic consulting. If the role is right, I'll know before the JD finishes loading.

View LinkedIn

Your details will only be used to respond to your enquiry and will not be shared with third parties.

Open to opportunities Coimbatore · Remote-friendly
Maju J. Mathew
Design Lead · Service & AI Product Design
Open to
Actively looking
Senior Design Manager Director of Design Principal Product Designer Head of Design
Tools & Skills
Figma Framer ProtoPie Storybook Design Systems Design Tokens WCAG 2.1/2.2 HTML CSS JavaScript Jira Confluence
Reply time: hours, not weeks. No ghost, no auto-decline.
AskMaju